MANILA, Philippines – Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Saturday warned that senators, along with members of the House of Representatives, may be complicit in the ongoing controversy involving anomalous and ghost flood control projects, reiterating his call for complete transparency in the national budgeting process.

Lacson said on radio that lawmakers from both chambers routinely propose budget amendments or "insertions"—a practice that, while technically legal, can be exploited to channel funds into questionable infrastructure projects.
“I’m not saying it’s only House members,” Lacson said in Filipino. “It’s possible that some senators have inserted funding for such projects and even profited from the 25 percent share typically given to the ‘funder’ or proponent.”
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal, This news data comes from:http://www.gyglfs.com
Pressed further on whether senators might be tied to these fraudulent schemes, the senator replied, “There may be senators and House members who are connected to anomalous flood control projects.”
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal
Lacson, a long-time advocate for budget transparency, refrained from naming specific individuals, stressing the importance of solid evidence. “It’s not right to name names without proof,” he said. “In my case, I only make findings public once they are backed by factual and verifiable information.”
- Construction managers, developers back Housing chief's anti-corruption advocacy
- DSWD's guarantee letters now accepted in more establishments
- Sara favors punishing officials, lifestyle checks
- International media protest over journalist deaths in Gaza
- Summer brings overtourism fears for 'Bavarian Caribbean'
- 2,000 North Korean troops killed in Russia deployment: Seoul spy agency
- Israeli protesters call for hostage deal ahead of cabinet meeting
- Opponents of Japan PM seek leadership contest
- Japanese climber, 102, sets Mount Fuji record
- Police general suspended for ‘obstruction’ of evidence in case of missing sabungeros